Compare
ContractRadar vs FindRFP
FindRFP and ContractRadar sit in the same price band and target similar buyers: small businesses pursuing federal and state RFPs. The real differences are in the matching engine and the breadth of sources. Here’s an honest side-by-side.
Last updated 2026-05-27. Pricing reflects publicly available information at the time of writing — verify directly on findrfp.com before purchasing.
At a glance
| ContractRadar | FindRFP | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $30/month flat ($360/year) | ~$30/month base plan (paid plans only; verify on findrfp.com) |
| Free tier | Yes — permanent, 5 searches/day, no credit card | Free trial only |
| Data sources | 67 portals (federal + 46 states + 11 cities + 8 counties) | Federal + state RFP database, daily updates |
| Alerts | Daily AI-scored email digest (Pro) | Keyword and category email alerts |
| AI features | Semantic embedding search + AI fit scoring on every match | Keyword and category filters; lighter AI |
| Past-award context | Federal matches surface USAspending.gov award history when available | Not a primary feature |
| Best for | Small businesses that want AI-scored matching beyond keyword overlap | Bidders comfortable with traditional keyword-driven RFP search at a low price point |
Where FindRFP wins
FindRFP has a head start in some specific areas. Honest list:
- Long-established RFP database. FindRFP has been aggregating federal and state RFPs for many years. The historical archive and category taxonomy are mature, which can be valuable if you research past solicitations as a proxy for future ones.
- Familiar keyword-driven workflow. If you’ve been finding bids via keyword search and category filters for a decade, FindRFP’s interface will feel native immediately. ContractRadar’s semantic-matching workflow is a different mental model and takes a few searches to evaluate.
- Straightforward feature set. FindRFP doesn’t try to be a full capture-management or matching platform. For users who specifically don’t want AI scoring opinionated about their results, that simplicity is a feature.
- Branded RFP-document workflows. FindRFP’s product is centered on the RFP document itself — alerts, downloads, summaries. If your buying motion is “search by category, download RFPs, respond,” the interface is tightly designed for that flow.
Where ContractRadar wins
- Semantic AI matching, not keyword filtering. Describe what your business does in plain language. The AI matches by meaning, so a janitorial firm sees postings titled “custodial services” and a cybersecurity firm sees “information assurance” — even when categories or NAICS codes don’t line up. Keyword-based tools miss those.
- AI-scored daily digest. Every match comes with a 0–100 fit score, so the email leads with the postings most likely to be worth your time. FindRFP’s alerts are time-ordered keyword matches.
- Broader explicit local coverage. ContractRadar monitors 11 city and 8 county portals directly (Atlanta, Boston, Broward County, Chicago, Clark County, Cook County, Denver, Harris County, Hillsborough County, Honolulu, Houston, King County, LA, LA County, NYC, Palm Beach County, Philadelphia, San Diego, SF) in addition to 46 state portals. Local opportunities that don’t funnel through state aggregators still show up.
- Permanent free tier. 5 searches/day forever, no credit card. You can validate the matching quality on your own NAICS codes before paying anything.
When to pick FindRFP instead of ContractRadar
Pick FindRFP if you specifically want a traditional keyword-and-category RFP database at a small-business price point — and you’d rather not have AI scoring ranking results for you. Buyers who’ve been using legacy RFP databases for years and have a tuned set of keywords and categories that work get value out of FindRFP’s direct, no-frills interface. If your workflow is “I know exactly what to search for; just send me the postings,” FindRFP delivers that without ContractRadar’s extra layer.
When to pick ContractRadar
Pick ContractRadar if you’d rather describe your business in plain language and let semantic matching find adjacent vocabularies than maintain a long list of keywords by hand. At the same monthly price as FindRFP, you get AI-scored daily digests, broader local coverage, federal past-award context, and a permanent free tier to evaluate matching quality first. For 1- to 10-person small businesses where nobody has time to babysit keyword lists, the AI does that work for you.
FAQ
Is FindRFP free?
FindRFP is a paid service. Public plans start around $30/month for the base tier. There is no permanent free tier — typically there's a free trial only. ContractRadar offers a permanent free tier (5 searches/day, no credit card) so you can evaluate matching quality before paying.
Does FindRFP cover federal contracts?
Yes. FindRFP advertises federal and state RFP coverage with daily updates and email alerts. ContractRadar covers SAM.gov plus SBA SubNet federally, 46 state portals, and 11 cities and 8 counties (Atlanta, Boston, Broward County, Chicago, Clark County, Cook County, Denver, Harris County, Hillsborough County, Honolulu, Houston, King County, LA, LA County, NYC, Palm Beach County, Philadelphia, San Diego, SF) — 67 sources total in one digest.
How does FindRFP pricing compare to ContractRadar?
Both are in a similar price band — around $30/month for the base plan. The differentiation is in the feature set. ContractRadar includes semantic AI matching (you describe your business in plain language and the AI scores each match by meaning) and AI-scored daily digests. FindRFP is built around keyword filters and category-based email alerts.
Can I use FindRFP and ContractRadar together?
You can, but most users pick one. They overlap heavily on intent (federal and state RFP discovery for small businesses). The honest framing: try ContractRadar's free tier first, then decide whether the AI matching is worth keeping vs FindRFP's keyword-driven model.